Saturday, September 25, 2010

Second Life is a Game....Is It?

This past week has seen some references to the phrase "SL is a game. I win", as what appears to be a badge of honor for a resident whom seems to have found the hidden end-game component that many a gamer has failed to find within Second Life. I and many other residents had been unaware that SL is really a game, until this resident declared it for all to hear. Perhaps we should help get this guy a job at the marketing department of Linden Labs so he can help bring in more of the gamers to join and start to play the 'game'.

Yes, I'm being sarcastic here but I can't help have a laugh at the insanity of the 'I win' phrase. Hence the opening title with the extremely sarcastic response courtesy of cringe comedian Jim Norton, "Is it?" Now, I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't see the game aspect of Second Life anywhere, except if you frequent the role play sims. Other possible titles for the blog posting that did not make the cut are “Breaking News: End-game found for Second life” and “Gamers rejoice: Linden Labs reveals quests and Boss battles for Second Life”

Last night I was talking this over with my mate and she was in agreement. My take on SL is that it is a mirror of our true selves. You are able to shape yourself as you wish. The shaping process allows you to choose your gender, height, age, weight, ethnicity, and even your behavior. True, you can do this in many MMOs but SL is very different.

I've played MMOs such as Guild Wars and Battlefield and have chatted with other players. You interact and have conversations at times but they are mostly game related. There is really no socializing aspect in the games, aside from that which would have to do with collaborating, plotting, jabs at other players, and claims of victory. MMOs normally don't have a social aspect in terms of:
• heading out to a club
• going to a concert
• watching a fashion show
• building and creating objects
• wearing the latest fashions or trends.

To call Second Life an MMO or a game is truly an error in judgement. Perhaps someone can explain the objective and the end-game as well. All games have a beginning and an end, they have a scoring system, and they have an objective. This is one of the problems that gamers as well as others encounter when they first arrive inworld; they find it boring because there is no objective mapped out for them. This is life 2.0 or social networking on steroids.

Life does not come with a roadmap and neither does Second Life. Linden Labs wants you to become a premium member and spend your real money on land, homes, clothing, vehicles, objects, and services. Beyond that, what you do and how you do it is your own business. The only objective, if you can call it that is, to have fun.

This, however, is not the end of this blog posting. I’m attempting to demonstrate that Second Life is a mirror or Real Life and as such, permits people to get emotionally involved. This involvement includes a range of emotions that vary from happiness to anger and everything in between. Though there may be the occasional couple that meets on Warcraft or another game, SL has an environment built just for the type of social networking necessary to foment friendship and beyond.

One need look no further than all the services available inworld having to do with marriage. There is a strong human component that not only feels everything the avatar feels but also shares in the experiences. The avatar is an extension of our true selves and to deny it would deny our own existence. We all know friends in SL that have been affected in their Real Life because of events that took place in SL. For some, the emotional impact has been so much, that they have abandoned SL completely or gone into hiding for a period of time. Studies such as this one titled “The Effect of the Emotion-related Channel in 3D Virtual Communication Environments” conducted by Sony Corp and Naruto University, demonstrate that emotions are strongly connected to the avatar experience.

Hence, I have to laugh when people not only think that SL is a game but that they can do as they please without consequences or repercushions. Statements like this reflect the lack of tact and humanity they possess. Toying with the human emotions of others, be it in SL or the real world, is simply wrong. To believe otherwise is immature and prepostorous. Avatars are made of pixels but that does not mean they are robots; there is a human controller behind each one. Let’s not forget that the pixels don’t move themselves and that the human component is always there, whether we want it or not.

5 comments:

  1. I kinda like that idea.

    The "end game" in SL, as in life is in the living of it. And in living it you can either define yourself as a winner or a loser. Your choice.

    Lots of people let others define them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Sal!
    I pretty much thought this way for along time as to what it is to me. (i get asked alot). And sl is pretty much what you said in this blog. Its a Social networking place, like fb ect. only with avatars,Behind those avatars, are real people with real feelings ect ^-^ so yeah i agree with all you said--cos its what i beleive it is aswell.

    Sakura

    ReplyDelete
  3. Certain phrasings when it comes to Second Life deeply offend me.

    First... referring to Second Life and Real Life as two separate entities. From now on when I hear someone make this claim I am going to give them the number of a local psychologist. Let's investigate disassociative disorders please... reality check??

    One brain. Multiple ports of interface and expression. Online social networking (via numerous platforms) is simply gateways to meeting new and interesting people.

    The second is referring to it as a Game.

    I caution that anyone referring to it as a game in my presence is going to get a real earful. If it's a game, show me how I advance? What level am I at? Please... Second Life is no more an MMORPG than Facebook is.

    Second Life is an activated online society of like minded intelligent (for the most part) technophiles, writers, artists, business people and creatives from all streams of self-expression.

    Game over. It is an online society. And anyone who thinks otherwise is not truly engaged in the platform.

    "nuff said...

    Skylar Smythe

    ReplyDelete
  4. Second Life is the evolution of a chat called Virtual Places, in which your avatar is a 48x60 pixel image. The cool thing about VP is your "chat room" is any website in existence. So you could make a website and invite people to it and sit and chat, play games or whatever.

    Second Life dumps the website portion and takes the world fully interactive which is awesome, if a bit laggy. The avatars are only limited by your imagination as you can become anything (like me, a Drider aka spider-taur).

    While I do like the simplicity of VP, SL is a who new world. you can do SO much more. And yes you can get attached to it very easily. So while you can get addicted like you can a game, that is honestly the only similarity.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is nice to see SL as an new world where a mind can be opened to every imagination. This depends on the possibiliy to be every thinkable being - as an avatar.

    Its a pity - on the other side - that this freedom, especially in newer days, often will be misunderstood as an kind of betraying. But why this? Is not the mind the real root of everything in world? Is not matter nothing else than changeable? Why it is so important for lots of people to know, who is behind the avatar? There is a mind behind, thats all. The real truth is, that nothing is important: Age, gender, shape, occupation, origin, possession... But in mind of people it remains as important, they cling on expections, and so they are loosing there mind(fullness), and all dramas oocurs.

    In my opinion SL not only mirrors RL, it also increases some effects of behaving and mind-confusions, namely and firstly surely the own. Hence its more important to take care towards the human behind the avatar. To see it as computergame is realy wrong. But to remain on well-defined roleplaying is not the worst way to stay in SL, to be not confused with emotions, and to enjoy all the benefits of imagination.

    ReplyDelete